Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 21:14:00 EST

Next message: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: performance of cache-intensive applications"
Previous message: Igor Schein: "performance of cache-intensive applications"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> ...
> > Could be. Removing -pipe affected it quite a bit.
>
> you could try decreasing PARENT_PENALTY to 50. I would like to see if
> the scheduler *still* thinks they're interactive stuff then.
>

That didn't seem to make much difference either way.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: performance of cache-intensive applications"
Previous message: Igor Schein: "performance of cache-intensive applications"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:17 EST