Re: bincancels in linux.kernel

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 22:50:42 EST

Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: Reserving physical memory at boot time"
Previous message: Bishop Brock: "Re: [Linux-pm-devel] Re: IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project"
Next in thread: Andrew Gierth: "Re: bincancels in linux.kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> writes:

> The big problem is when multiple gateways to news exist in multiple
> hierarchies. News servers accept a certain message only once - and the
> only thing that is looked at is the message-id.

> So if your news server gets fa.linux.kernel and linux.kernel, half of
> the articles will end up in the first group and half of the articles in
> the second.

fa.linux.kernel rewrites the message IDs. I believe that linux.kernel
does as well.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: Reserving physical memory at boot time"
Previous message: Bishop Brock: "Re: [Linux-pm-devel] Re: IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project"
Next in thread: Andrew Gierth: "Re: bincancels in linux.kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST