Andrew, Bill,
I had to learn from Michael Hohnbaum that you've eliminated the per
CPU time statistics in 2.5.50 (akpm changeset from Nov. 26). Reading
the cset comments I understood that the motivation was to save
8*NR_CPUS bytes of memory in the task_struct. Maybe that was really an
issue at the time when Bill suggested the patch (July), but in the
mean time we got configurable NR_CPUS (October) and that small amount
of additional memory really doesn't matter. Most people running SMP
have 2 CPUs.
I wasn't aware of the patch and the RFC from Bill, otherwise I would
have "shouted" long time ago. My fault... BTW: did that RFC go to the
LSE mailing list, too? I can't remember. But that's the place were I'd
expect to find people interested in such issues.
When digging in the kernel archives I found:
wli> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:12:32AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
wli> > A PS: to that. I'm not opposed to removing them. I'd prefer them left
wli> > around in the kernel debugging options though
wli>
wli> In that case, I can make it conditional on something like
wli> CONFIG_DEBUG_SCHED, which option of course would go in the "Kernel Hacking"
wli> section.
wli>
wli> Cheers,
wli> Bill
I find this idea better than just eliminating the only way of finding
out on which CPUs a task has spent its time. This is an essential
question when investigating the performance on SMP and NUMA systems.
For those who miss this feature I'm attaching a patch doing what wli
suggested. The config option is CONFIG_CPUS_STAT and can be found in
the "Kernel Hacking" menu, as wli suggested. Just didn't like
DEBUG_SCHED, we want to monitor the statistics and this is not
necessarily related to bugs in the scheduler. Also added as last line
in /proc/pid/cpu the current CPU of the task. It's often needed and
/proc/pid/stat is much too cryptic.
Regards,
Erich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST