Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2

From: Chris Wright (chris@wirex.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 18:44:44 EST

Next message: Orion Poplawski: "Re: NFS - IRIX client issues"
Previous message: Jim Houston: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:14:38AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > Also, I think the fixup should go directly in verify, since they are
> > always called together. Otherwise, this looks good. Thanks, it's been
> > sorely needed.
>
> Thanks for the changes, I'll use your version of this :)

alright, thanks.
-chris

-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Orion Poplawski: "Re: NFS - IRIX client issues"
Previous message: Jim Houston: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:20 EST