Re: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation

From: James Bottomley (James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 22:06:37 EST


miles@lsi.nec.co.jp said:
> My thinking was that a driver might want to do things like --
> if (dma_addr_is_consistent (some_funky_addr)) {
> do it quickly;
> } else
> do_it_the_slow_way (some_funky_addr);
> in other words, something besides just calling the sync functions, in
> the case where the memory was consistent.

Actually, I did code an api for that case, it's the dma_get_conformance() one
which tells you the consistency type of memory that you actually got, so if
you really need to tell the difference, you can.

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:21 EST