Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 23:11:16 EST


On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, george anzinger wrote:
>
> Once it changes the system call (eax, right), could the new
> call code then just get the parms from the restart_block.

Agreed.

> I think it would be best to keep this as generic as
> possible, i.e. let the new call code fetch its own
> paramerers from the restart_block.

We could even have one _single_ a generic "restart" system call, and have
the function pointer for that be in the restart block.

> My question is who sets up these values? I think you are
> saying it should be the system call. Is this right?

Whatever system call that return -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK, yes.

So it would never get set up at all in the fast path. Only in the error
case path of a system call that wants to have restarting capabilities.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:21 EST