Re: [pidhash] [0/4] patch series vs. 2.5.50-mm1

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 03:50:54 EST


On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:48:27PM -0800, wli@holomorphy.com wrote:
[...]

Sorry about the misnumbering; there were about half a dozen other
pidhashing related things that didn't make the cut (omitted largely
due to theoretical issues or not having enough testing bandwidth for
tonight's run) along with a fair amount of other non-pidhash-related
fat included in the original numbering scheme before the patch series
got renumbered and refined down to bits relevant to single maintainers.
Some were also excluded due to mutual interference.

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:22 EST