Hi,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Shawn Starr wrote:
> SLEEP SUSPEND SLEEP visible SUSPEND visible
> n n y n
> y n y y
> y y y y
>
> We really do need recursive support though. A user should not be able to
> select SOFTWARE_SUSPEND without SLEEP selected.
So just let SOFTWARE_SUSPEND depend on ACPI_SLEEP, if ACPI_SLEEP is
independent it doesn't has to depend on SUSPEND.
Another possibility is that you might want to restore the old behaviour,
that SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is always visible and forces ACPI_SLEEP to y if
needed, but then you have to explicitly disable the user prompt and
SOFTWARE_SUSPEND must not depend on ACPI_SLEEP:
config ACPI_SLEEP
bool "Sleep States" if !SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
default SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
config SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
bool "Software Suspend (EXPERIMENTAL)"
depends on EXPERIMENTAL && PM
bye, Roman
PS: Could you check your mailer why your mails don't reach lkml?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:23 EST