Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 15 (NOT HIGH RES)

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 13:35:14 EST

Next message: John Bradford: "Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.50"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 15 (NOT HIGH RES)"
Next in thread: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 15 (NOT HIGH RES)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

| Ok, finally starting to look at merging this, however:

I'm not too fond of changing NR_syscalls to the computed nr_syscalls,
or rather, not in this same patch.
IOW, it should be a separate patch IMO.

-- ~Randy

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Bradford: "Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.50"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 15 (NOT HIGH RES)"
Next in thread: george anzinger: "Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 15 (NOT HIGH RES)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:23 EST