Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>>Yes, there are about 10 patches to fix it floating around... I just
>>>hope linus takes one of them. (Fix is make ACPI_SLEEP depend on
>>>swsusp).
>>
>>
>>I haven't seen the patch, but does it make sense for hardware suspend to
>>depend on software suspend?
>>
>>IMO there should be a common core (CONFIG_SUSPEND?), not force ACPI to
>>depend on swsusp. That way you get the _least_ common denominator, not
>>the union of two sets.
>
>
> Feel free to fix that, but as swsusp is needed for S4, anyway, I do not
> see big need to do that.
Why should I fix your fix?
Doesn't that imply your fix is broken to begin with?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:24 EST