-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:49:10PM +0100, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as requested by GrandMasterLee (does he have a realname? ;) here goes
>> readlatency2 for 2.4.20aa1. Apply ontop of it.
>>
>> Note: This patch rippes out the elevator-lowlatency hack.
>
>how does it perform compared to elevator-lowlatency? I guess this is a
>call for Con to run a pass on it.
>
>Actually I still think the 32M queue on a 32M scsi machine during
>contigous writes where the elevator basically doesn't matter is a
>""bit"" overkill so I still like elevator-lowlatency somehow.
>elevator-lowlatency could do something smarter than it currently does
>though.
Ask and ye shall receive. Here are contest results comparing vanilla 2.4.20,
aa1 and aa1 with rl2:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 67.3 97 0 0 1.02
2.4.20aa1 [1] 68.0 97 0 0 1.03
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 67.4 97 0 0 1.02
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 65.7 99 0 0 0.99
2.4.20aa1 [1] 65.6 99 0 0 0.99
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 65.4 99 0 0 0.99
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 108.1 58 84 40 1.63
2.4.20aa1 [2] 224.6 28 342 70 3.39
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 223.1 29 337 70 3.37
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 207.2 32 2 46 3.13
2.4.20aa1 [3] 263.7 25 3 42 3.99
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 502.8 13 7 52 7.60
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 85.4 83 2 9 1.29
2.4.20aa1 [3] 86.3 82 3 10 1.30
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 97.1 78 3 10 1.47
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 107.6 64 2 8 1.63
2.4.20aa1 [1] 127.8 53 4 9 1.93
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 188.9 36 6 10 2.86
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 203.4 33 40 15 3.07
2.4.20aa1 [3] 238.3 27 46 15 3.60
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 302.5 22 63 16 4.57
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 120.3 56 24 16 1.82
2.4.20aa1 [3] 115.5 58 23 16 1.75
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 107.4 64 23 17 1.62
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 88.8 82 16 4 1.34
2.4.20aa1 [2] 97.8 71 18 6 1.48
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 130.1 54 26 6 1.97
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 75.7 88 0 8 1.14
2.4.20aa1 [2] 78.4 85 0 9 1.19
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 78.3 85 0 8 1.18
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 84.8 80 44 2 1.28
2.4.20aa1 [3] 179.7 37 59 1 2.72
2.4.20aa1rl2 [3] 180.2 37 51 1 2.72
Changes all over the place.
Cheers,
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE98HGsF6dfvkL3i1gRAnKJAJ9sW9tgN6Dzfu1s8/Ea8SUTBUf6egCfeyPY
3FAaG70qJYh7Z4PmZchFOYA=
=LCgH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:26 EST