Re: Proposed ACPI Licensing change

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Fri Dec 06 2002 - 20:06:02 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.18 beats 2.5.50 in hard drive access????"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer - PPC64"
Maybe in reply to: Grover, Andrew: "Proposed ACPI Licensing change"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposed ACPI Licensing change"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:36:13PM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:24:06 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >You can't forbid people to send GPL-only patches, so if a person doesn't
> >want his patch under your looser license you can't enforce that he also
> >releases it under your looser license.
>
> No, but then you just reject the patch.

Surely.

> DS

cu
Adrian

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.18 beats 2.5.50 in hard drive access????"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer - PPC64"
Maybe in reply to: Grover, Andrew: "Proposed ACPI Licensing change"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposed ACPI Licensing change"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST