Re: [RFC][PATCH] net drivers and cache alignment

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Dec 07 2002 - 18:30:45 EST


   From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
   Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 15:29:16 -0800

   Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Attached is cut #2. Thanks for all the near-instant feedback so far :)
> Andrew, does the attached still need padding on SMP?
   
   It needs padding _only_ on SMP. ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp.
   
non-smp machines lack L2 caches? That's new to me :-)

More seriously, there are real benefits on non-SMP systems.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST