Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 13:19:44 EST

Next message: Udo A. Steinberg: "[OOPS] 2.5.50 Emu10K1 OSS"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Why can't we simply have /bin/bash_that_splits_args_itself
> ?
> Pavel

We could, but it would in practice mean doing an extra exec() for each
executable. This seems undesirable.

-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Udo A. Steinberg: "[OOPS] 2.5.50 Emu10K1 OSS"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:15 EST