RE: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented

From: Shureih, Tariq (tariq.shureih@intel.com)
Date: Wed Dec 18 2002 - 15:25:28 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Maybe in reply to: Shureih, Tariq: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thanx. Just as I was waiting for your email, I was going through the kernel
to see where the message was coming from and {KABOOM} it hit me. This is
coming from lsmod! Duh!

Thank you again :)

-- Tariq Shureih Intel Corporation Opinions are my own and don't represent my emplyer

-----Original Message----- From: Chris Wright [mailto:chris@wirex.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:19 PM To: Shureih, Tariq Cc: Lmkl (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org) Subject: Re: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented

* Shureih, Tariq (tariq.shureih@intel.com) wrote: > > Kernel boots just fine, howeverl, "lsmod" gives me a messages: "QM_MODULES: > Function not implemented"

Did you update your module tools?

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/

-chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Maybe in reply to: Shureih, Tariq: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:20 EST