On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:47:26AM -0600, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > In message <20021217114846.A30837@in.ibm.com> you write:
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:17:05AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > BTW, this was done for (1) simplicity, (2) so KBUILD_MODNAME can be
> > > > used to construct identifiers, and (3) so parameters when the module
> > > > is built-in have a consistent name.
> > > >
> > > Ok, I see it now, this magic happens in scripts/Makefile.lib.
> > > My module has been built outside the kernel build system, that's
> > > why I saw this problem.
> > >
> > > I guess avoiding '-' should do it, but is there a simple way to
> > > correctly build (simple, test) modules outside the kernel tree now?
> >
> > Has there ever been a simple way?
>
> Well, you can do
>
> cd my_module
> echo "obj-m := my_module.o" > Makefile
> vi my_module.c
> make -C <path/to/kernel/src> SUBDIRS=$PWD modules
>
> That's not too bad (and basically works for 2.4 as well)
>
That's way cool! Thank you.
-- Vamsi Krishna S. Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore. Ph: +91 80 5044959 Internet: vamsi@in.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:22 EST