Re: Are working modules going to be in 2.6?

From: romieu@fr.zoreil.com
Date: Thu Dec 19 2002 - 17:04:11 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading)"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Are working modules going to be in 2.6?"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: Are working modules going to be in 2.6?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> :
[...]
> I have downloaded any number of modutil this and init-mod that, built them
> static, rolled my own initrd files, and as far as I can tell it just
> doesn't work with 2.5.48+.

Here it worked with 2.5.50 + module-init-tools-0.9. No special magic.
In-kernel 3c59x + initrd + (really gory style) nfs root.

If you're interested, kernel .config is available at:
http://electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com/2.5.50/misc/config.gz

--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading)"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Are working modules going to be in 2.6?"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: Are working modules going to be in 2.6?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:24 EST