-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>On Saturday 21 December 2002 05:39, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
>Hi Con,
>
>> Seems like io_load likes lower interactive deltas (lower the better?) and
>> mem_load likes high interactive_deltas (sweet spot 5).
>
>Yes, seems so. I think this is a good thing for autoregulating 8-)
Exactly my thoughts. Increasingly as the numbers are rolling out it is clear
the defaults seem to be pretty darn good (thanks mingo), but for -ck at least
I wont be able to resist and will autoregulate them once I have a full set of
numbers to play with. I'll get subsets of numbers (too messy to post them all
here) and decide what to use for my ranges. It's my impression so far that
the desktop experience with static numbers can only be improved upon by
dropping the max timeslice to resemble that of the old scheduler. Perhaps a
max timeslice of around 150ms.
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+BGFVF6dfvkL3i1gRAkQBAJsH5MLDRvSpa2VIY+u4Up2FZhdkUQCgg8sq
FAQx+63jqkrR1IUHIA3zZVQ=
=jWrY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST