On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:30:12AM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> revision. I just do it as a single CSET with the comments dispersed
> into the individual files that the comments apply to.
Which is perfectly acceptable IMHO. There is no reason that a cset need
document all the details when the file logs already do. A cset need only
indicate what basic work is being done and maybe a list of files in the
cset. Doing a bk changes -v gets the file comments as well for those
people that want them.
I actually like the individual file comments part of the cset setup. It's
what my preferred use is when I'm making my own patches. Make the cset
have a summary of the major changes, then let each file have it's own
detail change information.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST