Re: Poor performance with 2.5.52, load and process in D state

From: Paolo Ciarrocchi (ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org)
Date: Sun Dec 22 2002 - 12:09:06 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs"
Previous message: Helmut Jarausch: "Re: [2.4.21-p2] more VIA-IDE problems"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Poor performance with 2.5.52, load and process in D state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
[...]
Just to add the result of one more test:

> Ok, I'm back with the results of the osdb test against 2.4.19 and 2.5.52
> Both the kernel booted with apm=off mem=40M
> osdb ran with 40M of data.
> To summarize the results:
> 2.4.19 "Single User Test" 806.78 seconds (0:13:26.78)
> 2.5.52 "Single User Test" 3771.85 seconds (1:02:51.85)
2.4.19(mem=24M) "Single User Test" 3371.98 seconds (0:56:11.98)

Ciao,

Paolo

-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with POP3/IMAP access for only US$19.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs"
Previous message: Helmut Jarausch: "Re: [2.4.21-p2] more VIA-IDE problems"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Poor performance with 2.5.52, load and process in D state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:30 EST