one other thing that would be interesting to test on the osdl machines
would be the effect of different filesystems.
the origional set of tests were all done on reiserfs, it would be
interesting to see if there is a difference between it and the others.
David Lang
On 22 Dec 2002, Robert Love wrote:
> Date: 22 Dec 2002 20:06:51 -0500
> From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
> To: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
> Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest -
> starvation_limit
>
> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:48, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> > osdl, contest, tunable - starvation limit on 2.5.52-mm1
>
> Con, curiously, what is this OSDL hardware like?
>
> One thing I always liked about your Contest runs were you did them on
> your home machine, which was presumably fairly run-of-the-mill so we
> could keep an eye on the low-end desktop machines.
>
> Robert Love
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST