Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com)
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 07:19:45 EST

Next message: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: The only way around Microsoft"
Previous message: Marijn Ros: "2.4.21-pre2 IDE problems"
In reply to: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Next in thread: Jochen Friedrich: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Jochen Friedrich: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > I hate feeding lawyers
> > NVidia produce excellent gnu/linux/xfree drivers for their video cards,
>
> ?!? Since when does NVidia produce GNU (or even GPL) drivers ? That's
> very new to me, could you provide a link ?

Are drivers for Alpha, Sparc, or anything else with a pci slot apart
from an X86 machine available?

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: The only way around Microsoft"
Previous message: Marijn Ros: "2.4.21-pre2 IDE problems"
In reply to: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Next in thread: Jochen Friedrich: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Jochen Friedrich: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:19 EST