RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Date: Wed Jan 01 2003 - 02:43:22 EST

Next message: Herbert Xu: "Re: Recent 2.4.x PPP bug? (PPPIOCDETACH file->f_count=3)"
Previous message: jw schultz: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
In reply to: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Mark Rutherford: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hell.Surfers,

On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:

> You must understand the GNU/LINUX community is being manipulated by NVidia.

   NVIDIA Corporate Office:
   2701 San Tomas Expressway
   Santa Clara, CA 95050
   Tel: 408-486-2000
   Fax: 408-486-2200
   info@nvidia.com
   Directions to Corporate Office

> Dean. Three ways to kill yourself, and ive been drove in one...

GO FOR IT!

I will love to see the fall out.

Regards,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Herbert Xu: "Re: Recent 2.4.x PPP bug? (PPPIOCDETACH file->f_count=3)"
Previous message: jw schultz: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
In reply to: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Mark Rutherford: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:14 EST