RE:Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: sd driver NOT_READY behavior / was Re: How does the disk buffer cache work?"
• Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] move CONFIG_NET to net/Kconfig"
• In reply to: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:

> the eula is irrelevent, it should be GPL, oh and I read the drivers on
> a computer with an geforce card. which i now own;)
>
> Dean. Three ways to kill yourself, and ive been drove in one...
>

Well, I am glad you now own a "geforce card".
You are now a customer.
You can now execute your rants about the binary drivers with Nvidia.

Regards,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

Note to self, never be stupid enough to comment on data or information
from "Hell.Surfers", again !!! Somebody LART me please!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: sd driver NOT_READY behavior / was Re: How does the disk buffer cache work?"
• Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] move CONFIG_NET to net/Kconfig"
• In reply to: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:15 EST