Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 01:56:03 EST

On Thu Jan 02, 2003 at 06:48:33AM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> I say we start a driver based on the UTAHs. MR. Anderson had
> a good schedule :), knock knock neo... ;-))

And I live in Utah. ;-) Seriously though, that schedule would
only be feasible given enough human resources -- and given either
source code or proper docs for their chipsets, which relies on
Nvidia playing nice and kindly choosing to share.

Relying on guesswork and/or reverse engineering without proper
vendor cooperation, which is exactly the case with the Utah GLX
driver, it'll take a much longer time and will likely not attract
the same amount of human resources as a result.

 -Erik 

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST