RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

• Next message: David Gibson: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] UPDATE hermes: serialization fixes"
• Previous message: Andrey Panin: "Re: [RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Reply: Jon Portnoy: "RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> No .. then go somewhere else and discuss it. This is the kernel
> development list not a cross between a bad US talk show and the muppets

Now *that's* funny.

I don't know how the weather is where you are, but I appreciate a good flame
war during these cold winter months.

..Scott

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Gibson: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] UPDATE hermes: serialization fixes"
• Previous message: Andrey Panin: "Re: [RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Reply: Jon Portnoy: "RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:24 EST