In message <1041583024.8648.11.camel@rth.ninka.net> you write:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:10, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Hmm, I thought the sched stuff all runs under the network brlock? If
> > so, it doesn't need to be held in, since it's not preemptible.
>
> The packet schedulers transmit, not receive.
> They have their own queue locking, along with the device
> xmit lock.
Then the patch to mark the "owner" should be straightforward. I
haven't looked at kronos's patch in detail, though.
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:24 EST