Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Tupshin Harper (tupshin@tupshin.com)
Date: Sat Jan 04 2003 - 03:53:40 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "2.5.54-mm3"
Previous message: Shane R. Stixrud: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
In reply to: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>IMHO, if your wife would leave you for having no money shes an asshole. ;)
>
>Dean McEwan, If the drugs don't work, [sarcasm] take more...[/sarcasm].
>
>
>
Does anybody else think that RMS managed to clone himself 13 years ago,
and this guy is the unfortunate result?

-Tupshin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "2.5.54-mm3"
Previous message: Shane R. Stixrud: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
In reply to: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:25 EST