On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:00:29PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Can't test it, but the v850 part looks great, ah, it's lovely to see all
> that code being deleted...
>
> One comment: `arch_check_irq' is a bad name, it doesn't make it at all
> clear what it does.
>
> I might suggest inverting the sense, and using `irq_valid' -- the `arch_'
> prefix seems unnecessary (as with `irq_desc') since it's not a
> arch-specific version of a more general wrapper.
I used arch_ prefix to clearly mark arch specifig things, but
irq_valid() is probably a better name. Comments ?
-- Andrey Panin | Embedded systems software developer pazke@orbita1.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:25 EST