Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?

From: Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 06:15:30 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] rewritten page coloring for 2.4.20 kernel"
Previous message: François Boisson: "Re: New version of e2compr for 2.4.16 kernel...."
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] rewritten page coloring for 2.4.20 kernel"
Previous message: François Boisson: "Re: New version of e2compr for 2.4.16 kernel...."
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST