Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?

• Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
• Previous message: Mark Mielke: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 09:24:47PM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> "Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun@rogers.com> writes:
>
> > software. For how much money MS has, what have they innovated?
>
> Without Microsoft, there wouldn't be 2,4 GHz 32/64 bit microcomputers
> with 512 megabytes of main memory, ...

Take this half-baked crap elsewhere. I don't lurk on this list for this
drivel.

Find some statistics or facts disproving that someone else would have
filled this "void" and take your argument to someone who cares.

HAND.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
• Previous message: Mark Mielke: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST