Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Ian Molton (spyro@f2s.com)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 20:43:22 EST

Next message: Stephen Satchell: "Re: Honest does not pay here ..."
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] /proc/modules change"
In reply to: Mark Mielke: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Mark Mielke: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:37:53 -0500
Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote:

>
> Then one day - everybody upgrades to a new version of Linux. My
> support lines start ringing off the hook.

To which the answer is 'we dont support linux 9.8.4 yet, sorry.'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen Satchell: "Re: Honest does not pay here ..."
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] /proc/modules change"
In reply to: Mark Mielke: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Mark Mielke: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST