Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> so - we DO NOT need a 'simplistic' DTMF decoder.
You need a good one. But good can be simplistic, is what I'm saying.
DTMF was designed to be easy to decode reliably. Complex doesn't automatically
mean better.
I remember reading a more specific version of the message I pointed a pointer
to, but couldn't find it back. But it came down to the devil being in the details.
It probably pays to have someone look at this with old hardware experience in
this. Telco newsgroup perhaps.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:22 EST