> [gibbs@scsiguy.com]
>
> > [gibbs@scsiguy.com]
> >
> > These reads are actually more expensive than just using PIO. Neither of
> > these older drivers included a test to try and catch fishy behavior.
> >
> > Justin, are you quite sure that these tests actually work?
> > I too have just run into
>
> See my recent post to the SCSI list. The tests don't work on
> certain older controllers that lack a feature I was using. The
> latest csets submitted to Linus correct this problem (as verified
> on a dusty dual P-90 PCI/EISA box just added to our regression cluster).
Ok. I can confirm 6.2.26 fixes the false positive here:
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:10.0
PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 00:11.0
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.26
<Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI adapter>
aic7880: Ultra Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs
scsi1 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.26
<Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI adapter>
aic7880: Ultra Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs
Thanks,
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:22 EST