Re: observations on 2.5 config screens

From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 09:32:21 EST


On 7 Jan 2003, Robert Love wrote:

> The real problem in my opinion is that the category is misnamed. It is
> not "processor options" except for the first couple. The majority of
> the options should be under a title of "core" or "architecture" or
> "system options" in my opinion.
>
> Robert Love

Someone else suggested putting all the low level options like preempt,
smp, and the stuff in kernel-hacking into a single menu, with a better
name.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:23 EST