Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs

From: Wichert Akkerman (wichert@wiggy.net)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 11:43:47 EST

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: [PATCH] AGP 4/7: add generic print of AGP version & mode"
Previous message: Maciej Soltysiak: "Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs"
In reply to: Maciej Soltysiak: "Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs"
Next in thread: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Previously Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> I do not know how many tunnels are in my path, i know that hop distance to
> my tunnel is exactly 1 hop (ipv6 broker and ipv4 provider are the same)

My tunnel provider is 5 hops away. To my knowledge non of the ipv4 or
ipv6 hops in the path are congested and no traffic shaping is done.

> If there is immense traffic at one of the routers (total traffic on an
> interface) stream packets can be simply dropped if there are no queuing
> disciplines that would take eg. flow control into account.

I'll ask the ISPs involved to check if this might be happening, but I
highly doubt it.

> btw. what the hell is JunOs ?

Juniper OS, running on Juniper routers.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>           http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: [PATCH] AGP 4/7: add generic print of AGP version & mode"
Previous message: Maciej Soltysiak: "Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs"
In reply to: Maciej Soltysiak: "Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs"
Next in thread: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:24 EST