Re: observations on 2.5 config screens

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 14:50:00 EST


On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> I guess, depending on your definition of fundemental. I would put any
> option which affects the kernel as a whole in that category, myself.
> Compiling with frame pointers comes to mind, since every object file is
> changed and there are performance implications as well.

No-one other than kernel hackers should be playing with that option,
hence it's in the kernel hacking menu.

> Processor option would select the processor and any architecture dependent
> options, I would think. Something like "kernel characteristics" could have
> options like smp.

SMP isn't a processor option ?

                Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:24 EST