RE: [BUG - HRT patch] nanosleep returns 0 on failure

From: Fleischer, Julie N (julie.n.fleischer@intel.com)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 15:53:45 EST


> george anzinger wrote:
> If you don't mind, I will add your test code to my
> clock_nanosleep test code so this does not creep back in.

Sure. It's all GPL. The 6-1.c test case (attached below) probably has the
best test because it does multiple values, some < 0, some >= 1000 million.

One other thing I forgot to write in my previous report is that
clock_nanosleep() appeared to behave as expected, just nanosleep() showed
the issue of returning 0 on failure.

Thanks.
- Julie

----
test 6-1.c
/*   
 * Copyright (c) 2002, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
 * Created by:  julie.n.fleischer REMOVE-THIS AT intel DOT com
 * This file is licensed under the GPL license.  For the full content
 * of this license, see the COPYING file at the top level of this 
 * source tree.

* Test that nanosleep() sets errno to EINVAL if rqtp contained a * nanosecond value < 0 or >= 1,000 million */ #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <errno.h>

#define PTS_PASS 0 #define PTS_FAIL 1 #define PTS_UNRESOLVED 2

#define NUMTESTS 7

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct timespec tssleepfor, tsstorage; int sleepnsec[NUMTESTS] = {-1, -5, -1000000000, 1000000000, 1000000001, 2000000000, 2000000000 }; int i; int failure = 0;

tssleepfor.tv_sec=0;

for (i=0; i<NUMTESTS;i++) { tssleepfor.tv_nsec=sleepnsec[i]; printf("sleep %d\n", sleepnsec[i]); if (nanosleep(&tssleepfor, &tsstorage) == -1) { if (EINVAL != errno) { printf("errno != EINVAL\n"); failure = 1; } } else { printf("nanosleep() did not return -1 on failure\n"); return PTS_UNRESOLVED; } }

if (failure) { printf("At least one test FAILED\n"); return PTS_FAIL; } else { printf("All tests PASSED\n"); return PTS_PASS; } } **These views are not necessarily those of my employer.** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:25 EST