>>>At some point in the past, I wrote:
>>> Either pollwait tables (invisible in 2.4 and 2.5), kernel stacks of
>>> threads (which don't get pae_pgd's and are hence invisible in 2.4
>>> and 2.5), or pagecache, with a much higher likelihood of pagecache.
>>On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:44:10PM -0600, Brian Tinsley wrote:
>> The "kernel stacks of threads" may have some bearing on my incarnation
>> of this problem. We have several heavily threaded Java applications
>> running at the time the live-locks occur. At our most problematic site,
>> one application has a bug that can cause hundreds of timer threads (I
>> mean like 800 or so!) to be "accidentally" created. This site is
>> scheduled for an upgrade either tonight or tomorrow, so I will leave the
>> system as it is and see if I can still cause the live-lock to manifest
>> itself after the upgrade.
>There is no extant implementation of paged stacks yet.
For the most part, this is probably a boundary condition, right? Anyone
that intentionally has 800+ threads in a single application probably
needs to reevaluate their design :)
>I'm working on a different problem (mem_map on 64GB on 2.5.x). I probably
> won't have time to implement it in the near future, I probably won't
be doing it
>vs. 2.4.x, and I won't have to if someone else does it first.
Is that a hint to someone in particular?
---[========================]- -[ Brian Tinsley ]- -[ Chief Systems Engineer ]- -[ Emageon ]- -[========================]-
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:31 EST