On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> the small patch fixes a potential problem in the migration thread for
> the case that the first CPU in the cpus_allowed mask of a process is
> offline. Please consider applying it to your trees.
I'm not mingo, but I can say this looks sane. My only question is
whether there are more codepaths that need this kind of check, for
instance, what happens if someone does set_cpus_allowed() to a cpumask
with !(task->cpumask & cpu_online_map) ?
Thanks,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST