On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> At some point in the past, I wrote:
> >> So the end-result of the discussion is, "What should really happen here?"
> >> and "What, if anything, do you want me to do?"
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:12:12PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > IMHO best would be to get rid of /proc/*/wchan and keep the kallsyms
> > lookup slow, simple and stupid.
>
> Slow, simple, and stupid == "wli, get the Hell out". I'm gone.
Indeed! I think that was Andi volunteering :-}
But we should let rml defend his wchan.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:33 EST