On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:24:42AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I see no reason to not believe Linus when he says an interface is
> stable. And that's exactly what he said (or wrote in this case).
Linus had no problem with changing his opinion after strong words in the
past :)
But what exactly is the problem with a changing defintion for you. There
is neither a stable kernel nor a formal glibc release with this defined
out yet. That means the ABI isn't formalized and the number can be
allocated where it belongs.
Who cares what Linus said in the past as long as Linux development goes
to the right direction?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:38 EST