On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:52, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote:
> > You're wrong. You wouldn't have to jump over them any more than you
> > have to jump over the "goto" statement.
>
> The goto is a conditional jump. You propose replacing it with a
> conditional jump past the error handling code predicated on the
> opposite condition. Where's the improvement?
The goto is absolutely not a conditional jump. The if that precedes it
is conditional. The goto is not. The if is already there.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:42 EST