APIC version
From: Protasevich, Natalie (Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 13:44:06 EST
- Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
- Previous message: Jaroslav Kysela: "[PATCH] more PnP fixes and cleanups"
- Next in thread: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
I have a little patch here for the APIC version.
Without it, I get version 0x10 instead of 0x14 for Fosters/Gallatins
(booting with ACPI):
--- mpparse.c.org 2003-01-13 11:32:18.000000000 -0700
+++ mpparse.c 2003-01-13 11:33:26.000000000 -0700
@@ -773,6 +773,8 @@
if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid == -1U)
boot_cpu_physical_apicid = GET_APIC_ID(apic_read(APIC_ID));
+ apic_version[smp_processor_id()] =
GET_APIC_VERSION(apic_read(APIC_LVR));
+
Dprintk("Boot CPU = %d\n", boot_cpu_physical_apicid);
}
@@ -795,7 +797,7 @@
processor.mpc_type = MP_PROCESSOR;
processor.mpc_apicid = id;
- processor.mpc_apicver = 0x10; /* TBD: lapic version */
+ processor.mpc_apicver = apic_version[smp_processor_id()];
processor.mpc_cpuflag = (enabled ? CPU_ENABLED : 0);
processor.mpc_cpuflag |= (boot_cpu ? CPU_BOOTPROCESSOR : 0);
processor.mpc_cpufeature = (boot_cpu_data.x86 << 8) |
It seems to work OK for me, although you may find some implications...
Anyway -
Thanks,
--Natalie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
- Previous message: Jaroslav Kysela: "[PATCH] more PnP fixes and cleanups"
- Next in thread: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Nakajima, Jun: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Maybe reply: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: APIC version"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:46 EST