Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

From: John Levon (levon@movementarian.org)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 17:42:51 EST

Next message: Adam Belay: "Re: Linux v2.5.57"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:14:52AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:

> >But still requiring up-apic, or smp with apic, right?
>
> nmi_watchdog=2 - uses performance counters, not apic.

which requires a local APIC to set up NMI delivery mode like Jens said

regards
john

-- 
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the thread is over.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Adam Belay: "Re: Linux v2.5.57"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:47 EST