Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 11:04:49 EST

Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver"
Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault"
In reply to: Stephen D. Smalley: "Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58"
Next in thread: Stephen D. Smalley: "Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:44:52AM -0500, Stephen D. Smalley wrote:
> + * caller must verify that inode->i_fop is not NULL. The file should

Oh, and this comment was and still is wrong 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver"
Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault"
In reply to: Stephen D. Smalley: "Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58"
Next in thread: Stephen D. Smalley: "Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:54 EST