On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> >
> > the attached patch (against 2.5.59) is my current scheduler tree, it
> > includes two main areas of changes:
> >
> > - interactivity improvements, mostly reworked bits from Andrea's tree and
> > various tunings.
> >
>
> Thanks for doing this. Initial testing with one workload which is extremely
> bad with 2.5.59: huge improvement.
>
Initial testing on my NUMA box looks good. So far, I only have
kernbench numbers, but the system time shows a nice decrease,
and the CPU % busy time has gone up.
Kernbench:
Elapsed User System CPU
ingoD7-59 28.944s 285.008s 79.998s 1260.8%
stock59 29.668s 283.762s 82.286s 1233%
I'll try to get more testing in over the next few days.
There was one minor build error introduced by the patch:
#define NODE_THRESHOLD 125
was removed, but the NUMA code uses this.
--Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486 hohnbaum@us.ibm.com T/L 775-5486
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST