Re: [RFC] [PATCH] new modversions implementation

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 02:07:57 EST


In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301252025350.6749-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu> yo
u write:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > A genksyms replacement should do all the three steps above?
>
> Yes, I think at some point I should take a look at patching genksyms so
> that the post-processing above is not necessary anymore. However, it
> doesn't hurt much, performance-wise.

Of course, genksyms belongs in the kernel sources, too, since it's
intimately tied to them.

One step at a time...
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:18 EST