Re: Bootscreen

From: Erik Mouw (J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 12:41:39 EST

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: PID of multi-threaded core's file name is wrong in 2.5.59"
Previous message: Daniel Jacobowitz: "Re: PID of multi-threaded core's file name is wrong in 2.5.59"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Bootscreen"
Next in thread: Arador: "Re: Bootscreen"
Reply: Arador: "Re: Bootscreen"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:50:42PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Lots of systems cannot do 800x600 or 1024x768. Some of them cannot
> do 640x480 very well but 640x480 is safe except for weird kit because
> of the VGA mode support.

Hey, we have aalib for that :)

Erik

-- 
J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw
Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl  mouw@nl.linux.org
WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: PID of multi-threaded core's file name is wrong in 2.5.59"
Previous message: Daniel Jacobowitz: "Re: PID of multi-threaded core's file name is wrong in 2.5.59"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Bootscreen"
Next in thread: Arador: "Re: Bootscreen"
Reply: Arador: "Re: Bootscreen"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:20 EST