Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 11:40:22 EST

Dave Jones wrote:

>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:56:07PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive,
> > and thus a better FS benchmark.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
>It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling
>bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure
>to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small
>writes.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
Sigh. The alternative is to strace the compile, write a perl scipt or
something to get just the FS related calls out of it, and then create a
program with just the FS related calls. gcc -E sounds easier to me.;-) 

-- 
Hans

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:26 EST